Legal Opinion

Acosta v. United States

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 16, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01086Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 2:17-cr-00118-APG 4 Plaintiff ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE 5 v. [ECF No. 34] 6 ROGER ACOSTA, 7 Defendant 8 Defendant Roger Acosta pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in 9 violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He moves under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate 10 his conviction and sentence. ECF No. 34. He argues that, based on the Supreme Court’s holding 11 in Rehaif v. United States,

139 S. Ct. 2191

(2019), his indictment was fatally defective because 12 the government failed to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API