Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Park City Municipal Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2009No. 07-4273PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the enforcement of municipal ordinances forbidding any person, with certain exceptions, from selling goods or merchandise on the streets, in the parks, or on other city property against a visual artist selling his own work. 1
I. Background
According to the first amended complaint, which for purposes of this appeal of the grant of a motion to dismiss we assume to be true, Plaintiff-Appellant Shaun L. Christensen is a “visual artist” who “creates and makes prints which he displays and sells.” He “generates and welcomes income from the sale of his work.”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Thomson v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Spiegel v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Riggins v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Cordova v. AragonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Fisher v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.