Legal Opinion
Farley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 1, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STIFTEL, President Judge.
Appellant (Claimant) had been working for Sears, Roebuck & Company since 1951. At the time he came to work, he had a disease of his right eye dating from birth which affected his vision, noticeably from age 14. Also, while he was working for Sears, he developed difficulty with his hearing. At one time he was display manager but because of his sight difficulty he was demoted. His demotion came shortly before an accident which he alleges occurred on November 4, 1965 in the parking lot at Sears. At the time, he was bending over to pick up a fallen sign when a customer’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Le Tourneau v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Barnes v. PanaroSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Smith v. Essex County Park Commission, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1937
- E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. WhitsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Battista v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
- Malik v. DeyarminSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017