Legal Opinion
Battista v. Chrysler Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 21, 1986PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’HARA, Judge.
The matters before the Court involve an appeal by employee, Elio Battista (“Battis-ta”) and a cross appeal by employer, Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) of a decision by the Industrial Accident Board (“Board”), dismissing Battista’s Petition To Determine Compensation Due To Injured Employee, pursuant to 19 Del.C. §§ 2301 and 2304. Battista submits that the Board’s determination that psychological injuries are not compensable unless preceded by physical injuries is an incorrect interpretation of §§ 2301, 2304, and applicable caselaw, as well as being directly contrary to this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Olney v. CoochSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Wolfe v. Sibley Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Albanese's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Devine v. Advanced Power Control, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.