C.I.T. Corporation v. Grosick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense as to the Manchester Auto and Machine Company, intervening defendant. Plaintiff, C. I. T. Corporation, filed its action in replevin against A. J. Grosick for an automobile truck, basing its action upon a bailment lease dated January 13, 1930. The lease shows that the Manchester Auto and Machine Company, former owners, leased the truck to A. J. Grosick and on the same day assigned their interest to the plaintiff. A copy of the lease and assignment are attached to the declaration. A. J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Hall's Safe Co. v. WalenkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Architectural Tile Co. v. McSorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Judson C. Burns, Inc. v. WeinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Nelly v. DiskinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Ricci v. PelinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934