Legal Opinion

Ricci v. Pelino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1934No. Appeal 261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opnsrioisr by

James, J.,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the court of common pleas of Allegheny County making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient reply in an action of replevin. The procedure is based on Rule 139 of that court relating to actions of replevin, which rule is as follows:

“When the defendant in an action of replevin claims a lien on the property and not ownership of it, or has distrained the same1 for rent, he shall set forth in his affidavit of defense the particulars of his claim, and the plaintiff shall, within fifteen days after notice of the filing of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Derbyshire Bros. v. McManamySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Kull v. General Motors Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hein v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnstown Millwork & Lumber Co. v. VarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API