Legal Opinion

Dikun v. New York Central Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichabd D. Simons, J.

In this death action, plaintiffs seek to examine a member of the train crew before trial and also to examine the trainmaster and obtain from him copies of the statements of all crew members concerning the facts of the accident made within one month of the accident. Plaintiffs also seek the trainmaster’s report. Defendant cross-moves for a protective order and refuses to allow the crew member to testify until supplied with a copy of his statement made earlier to plaintiffs ’ attorney.

The right to examine the employee of a party is granted by CPLR 3101 (subd. [a], par. [1]). It is entirely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Menyweather v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. O'Neill v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mold Maintenance Service v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Pinn v. Supermarkets General Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1980
  4. State v. Iranian Caviar & Sturgeon Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1979
  5. Frawley v. AlbrechtNew York Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API