Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 6, 2021No. 1:18-cv-01896Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 18-cv-01896-CMA-NYW CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and HOLCIM (US) INC., Defendants. ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang This matter is before the court on three Motions: (1) Holcim (US) Inc’s Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Stay Discovery”) [Doc. 146,1 filed September 3, 2021]; (2) The Motion to Stay/Continue Briefing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United Steelworkers of America v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Francis S.L. Wang v. Paul Hsu C v. Chen Kwan Tao Li Lee and Li, a Partnership, D. Michael Clayton, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Bustos v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API