Legal Opinion

Neal v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 8, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01033Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND TIFFANY NEAL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ELH-19-1033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Tiffany Neal, a disabled U.S. Army veteran, filed a tort suit against the United States of America (the “Government”), pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”),

28 U.S.C. § 2671

et seq. ECF 1 (the “Complaint”). The suit arises from events that occurred in 2017, while Neal was a patient at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (“VA”) in Baltimore. In particular, plaintiff claims that a male employee of…

2Cases cited115 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API