Legal Opinion

Butron v. Cantu

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 19, 1998No. 13-97-152-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

This is an appeal 1 of a temporary Injunction prohibiting collection of a supersedeas bond. The 138th District Court of Cameron County rendered a judgment for Juan Bu- tron and Enrique Villarreal against Mark Cantu. A supersedeas bond was posted to prevent execution on the judgment, which has since been reviewed on appeal and affirmed. Cantu brought an action against the judgment creditors and their attorney for wrongful garnishment in the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, which granted a temporary injunction preventing them from removing or converting to cash the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cook v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Switzer v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Cantu v. Butron, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  4. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Lloyds Alliance v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Shor v. Pelican Oil & Gas Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. In Re Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Gardner v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API