Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District v. Muzzi

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1978No. Civ. 41396PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

Appellants, owners of a large tract of property in Marin County, appeal from a judgment in condemnation after the jury determined the value of their property to be $600,000. Respondent sought to condemn the property in connection with the construction of a ferry terminal in Larkspur.

The subject property consists of between 589 and 600 acres in the Town of Corte Madera; 369-380 acres are tidelands (submerged) and the remaining 199-220 acres lie behind dikes. Of the area behind the dikes about 60 acres are filled; the rest is low and marshy. The property is a short distance from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. McNealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Littoral Development Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Kenneth Mebane Ranches v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Mitton v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API