Legal Opinion

People v. McNeal

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1979No. Docket Nos. 17867, 17868PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

Appellants Russell McNeal and Nathan Nix were convicted, after trial by jury, of violation of Penal Code section 211 (robbery), and violation of Penal Code section 459 (burglary). Appellant Nix also was found to have used a firearm in the commission of the robbery and the burglary. Appellant McNeal was also found to be in violation of his probation for a previous violation of Penal Code sections 236 (false imprisonment), 221 (assault with intent to commit a felony), and 594 (vandalism).

In the early morning hours of April 25, 1977, the victim, Allen Fawkes, was awakened in his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. ManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. AdcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API