Legal Opinion

People v. A.L. (In re A.L.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 30, 2019No. H045802PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrover, J.

*18A.L. was declared a ward of the juvenile court after it found she committed three offenses: battery on a peace officer, resisting an officer, *19and resisting an officer with force. A.L. contends the court erred by not considering her state of mind at the time she resisted. Two of the offenses--resisting an officer ( Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1) ) and forcefully resisting an officer ( Pen. Code, § 69 )--require actual knowledge that an officer is engaged in the performance of duty. Since the record does not unambiguously show the juvenile court misapplied the law, we must affirm the wardship…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Williams v. GarcettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James v. Uber Technologies Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Minser v. Collect Access, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Muoi Van Duong v. Stew ShermanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  5. People v. GreshamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API