Legal Opinion

James v. Uber Technologies Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 16, 2019No. 3:19-cv-06462Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THOMAS COLOPY, Case No. 19-cv-06462-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 9 v. INJUNCTION, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S 11 Defendant. MOTION TO STRIKE 12 Docket Nos. 2, 11 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Thomas Colopy (“Plaintiff”) works as a driver for Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant” 16 or “Uber”). Plaintiff brings this putative class action alleging that Uber misclassifies its drivers as 17 independent…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API