Legal Opinion

Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 5, 2025No. 3:24-cv-06194Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JUNG MIN LEE, Case No. 24-cv-06194-WHO 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING FDIC-R AND 8 v. EVANS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING 9 FORIS DAX, INC., et al., IN PART CRYPTO.COM MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 89, 91, 92 11 12 Plaintiff Jung Min Lee (“Lee”) alleges that defendant Foris DAX, Inc. (d/b/a and hereafter, 13 “Crypto.com”) enabled unknown internet cryptocurrency scammers to take advantage of her 14 “elderly” husband, Patz, who is over the age of 65, by soliciting him to withdraw fiat…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API