Legal Opinion

Roy C. Knapp & Sons, Inc. v. County of Putnam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated January 12, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*771We agree with the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs failure to comply with the notice provisions contained in article 24 of the contract entitled the defendant to summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Staines v. Nassau Queens Medical GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Ritangela Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Board of Education v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Provo v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin Iron & Construction Corp. v. E.W. Howell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API