Legal Opinion

Zastrow v. Schaumburger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

Just prior to and at the time of the collision which occurred on February 17, 1931, at about seven o’clock in the morning, the plaintiff’s husband, as the servant of Wisconsin Valley Electric Company, was driving a Cadillac automobile in a squtherly direction on U. S. highway 51, and the defendant Schaumburger, as the servant of defendant Loomans, was driving a Dodge truck along said highway *119in the opposite direction. Highway 51, at the place of collision, was concreted to a width of eighteen feet which was free of snow or ice.' The road was straight from a curve located about 750 feet south…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Andrzejewski v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Steinhofel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kressin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Musha v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Edeler v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Schueler v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Gospodar v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API