Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Henry Caplan, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.

Defendant moves herein for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice in that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This is an action for specific performance instituted by the plaintiff to compel the defendant, a Chrysler automobile dealer, to deliver to the plaintiff a new Chrysler pursuant to a written order dated January 20, 1943. Plaintiff, on the signing of the order, deposited $100 as a down payment.

Though in a motion under rule 106 a pleading challenged for legal insufficiency must be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. Rosenstock Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fortner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. McCallister v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Kelley v. Creston Buick Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Maas v. WeitzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Kalman v. Thornton-Fuller Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API