Legal Opinion

Holida v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. 15221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Defendant, Donald Merrill (Merrill), appeals from a judgment of the trial court voiding a land sale agreement wherein Merrill purchased property in Canistota, South Dakota, from the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company (Company). We affirm.

In June of 1985, Company quitclaimed to Merrill approximately four and one-half acres of its property in Canistota. This property is bounded on the northeast by Warehouse Street. 1 Plaintiffs, Harold and Mary Holida (Holidas), own property bounded on the southwest by Warehouse Street, thus the two properties are situated across…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. FreedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  2. Aberdeen Cable TV Service, Inc. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Kirby v. Citizens' Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sweatman v. BathrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. North Central Investment Co. v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pluimer v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Tibbitts v. ANTHEM HOLDINGS CORPORATIONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Pluimer v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API