Legal Opinion

Pluimer v. City of Belle Fourche

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1996No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

549 N.W.2d 202 (1996)

1996 SD 65

Wayne PLUIMER, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CITY OF BELLE FOURCHE, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 19282.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs February 14, 1996.

Decided June 5, 1996.

Dwight A. Gubbrud of Carr & Pluimer Belle Fourche, for plaintiff and appellant.

Wesley W. Buckmaster of Buckmaster & Macy Belle Fourche, for defendant and appellee.

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] The trial court affirmed the City's right to assess the cost of constructing a sidewalk against Pluimer and he appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2] On August 2, 1957, a plat was…

Also in this document: Dissent · Miller; Dissent · Gilbertson.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Caneva v. Miners and Merchants BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sparagon v. Native American Publishers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cuka v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. First Western Bank v. Livestock Yards Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API