Pluimer v. City of Belle Fourche
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] The trial court affirmed the City’s right to assess the cost of constructing a sidewalk against Pluimer and he appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] On August 2,1957, a plat was recorded of Lot H-3 in Belle Fourche, South Dakota. Lot H-3 was surveyed and platted for the relocation of U.S. Highway 85. Lot H-3 was conveyed by warranty deed from Harry, Clifford, Lloyd, and Doris Gay and Patricia Frank to the State. The deed stated in part:... Grantors ... in consideration of Six thousand three hundred thirty three DOLLARS GRANTS, CONVEYS AND WARRANTS to the State of South Dakota,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. TeveldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Aberdeen Cable TV Service, Inc. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Northwest Realty Co. v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Sweatman v. BathrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tripp v. F & K ASSAM FAMILY, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Tibbitts v. ANTHEM HOLDINGS CORPORATIONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Berger v. Town of New DenmarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Pluimer v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996