Legal Opinion

Pluimer v. City of Belle Fourche

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] The trial court affirmed the City’s right to assess the cost of constructing a sidewalk against Pluimer and he appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2] On August 2,1957, a plat was recorded of Lot H-3 in Belle Fourche, South Dakota. Lot H-3 was surveyed and platted for the relocation of U.S. Highway 85. Lot H-3 was conveyed by warranty deed from Harry, Clifford, Lloyd, and Doris Gay and Patricia Frank to the State. The deed stated in part:... Grantors ... in consideration of Six thousand three hundred thirty three DOLLARS GRANTS, CONVEYS AND WARRANTS to the State of South Dakota,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. TeveldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Aberdeen Cable TV Service, Inc. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Northwest Realty Co. v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sweatman v. BathrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tripp v. F & K ASSAM FAMILY, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tibbitts v. ANTHEM HOLDINGS CORPORATIONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Berger v. Town of New DenmarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pluimer v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API