Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arment v. Henry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1983No. 47957-7PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Plaintiffs were inmates at the Washington State Corrections Center in Shelton at the time of the "New Year's Riot" in 1981. All are indigent. Each was informed on March 18, 1981, he was scheduled to see the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles for a disciplinary hearing in April. The notices described the charges and stated if the inmate was found guilty, the Board could redetermine the inmate's minimum term and revoke any or all good time credits earned or to be earned. The notices further provided, "You may have an attorney of your choice represent you at the hearing, at your expense. . . .…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Monohan v. BurdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of ReismillerWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of WhiteselWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of PiercyWashington Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API