Legal Opinion
MetLife Home Loans v. Hansen
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided September 28, 2012No. 106,846PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Arnold-Burger, J.:
When a borrower defaults on a promissory note that is secured by a real estate mortgage, the lender may foreclose on the mortgaged property to collect on the note. In this case, MetLife Home Loans, a Division of MetLife Bank, N.A. (MetLife) claims to be the holder of both the promissory note (Note) and the corresponding mortgage (Mortgage) on property owned by C.T. and Kelly Hansen (Hansens). There is no dispute that the Note is in default. Due to the default, MetLife seeks to foreclose on the property to collect on the Note. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Landmark National Bank v. KeslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Board of County Commissioners v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Johns, Et Ux. v. GillianSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jillian Cohen Bergeron v. New York Community BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- William R. Imler, As Successor Trustee of the Virginia L. Imler Trust v. First Bank of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- Ellis v. Popular BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- FV-I, Inc. v. KallevigSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017