Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Internal Revenue Service
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 14, 1999No. CIV. 98-186 ACKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On August 14, 1997, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Agent Daniel Keahey sent a letter to Plaintiff Charles Murphy (“Plaintiff’) advising him that the IRS had received information that he was possibly involved in a fraudulent trust arrangement. On September 12, 1997, Plaintiff submitted a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request to Agent Keahey’s office seeking a variety of items specifically pertaining to the year 1997, including: (1) tax returns, “lists,” or “statements;” (2) computerized “references”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- James Miller v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Church of Scientology v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.