Legal Opinion

Abel v. Wyrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1978No. 60227PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which petitioner claims that he is being illegally confined because of failure to afford him his due process rights at his probation revocation hearing. This court has jurisdiction and venue, as will be gone into below. The major issues for our consideration on the merits are whether (1) failure to notify petitioner of the violations to be charged against him prior to hearing violated his due process rights, in light of his admission that he committed the violations; (2) whether the trial judge considered, and if not, should have considered,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Daryl Standlee v. B. J. RhayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Wiglesworth v. WyrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Poucher v. VincentSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Beaird v. Del MuroMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Fleming v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API