Legal Opinion

Dameier v. Bayor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit brought by W. A. Bayor, ag'ainst C. W. Dameier, to recover an amount claimed to be due for rent of a certain lot, and for a quantity of brick and stone sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. In the Superior Court the parties, by agreement, waived a jury and a trial was had before the court, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff, which, on appeal, was affirmed in the Appellate Court.

On the trial the plaintiff put in evidence a contract in writing, as follows:

“I hereby agree to purchase from W. A. Bayor a lot of brick and rubble stone delivered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hilliard v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Priest v. DodsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bank of Anderson v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Bright v. RiedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Heinrich v. KirbyMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pegram v. MiserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API