Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hall Ex Rel. County of Yuma

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Reg Lynn Hill claims that the trial court erred by denying his request for a change of judge pursuant to Rule 17.4(g) of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that an earlier Rule 10.2 change of judge at his request was an exercise of his only peremptory challenge and that he is not entitled to a second peremptory change of judge pursuant to Rule 17.4(g). We accepted jurisdiction and denied relief, with this opinion to follow.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Petitioner was charged with one count of possession of a dangerous drug, one count of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fiveash v. Superior Court of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Chavez v. SUPERIOR COURT CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Reed v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Scott Allen Woodington v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Claudia Patricia Higuera v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Hill v. Hall Ex Rel. County of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API