Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hall Ex Rel. County of Yuma

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0284Published

1Opinion of the Court

980 P.2d 967 (1999)

194 Ariz. 255

Reg Lynn HILL, Petitioner,

v.

The Honorable Philip HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF YUMA, Respondent Judge,

State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

No. 1 CA-SA 98-0284.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

May 27, 1999.

M. Josephine Sotelo and Michael J. Donovan, Yuma, for Petitioner.

David S. Ellsworth, Yuma County Attorney by Thomas E. Varela, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Reg Lynn Hill claims that the trial court erred by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Stephens v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API