Claudia Patricia Higuera v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STARING, Judge:
¶ 1 By special action, Claudia Higuera challenges the respondent judge’s determination that she had waived her right to a peremptory change of judge under Rule 10.2, Ariz. R. Crim, P., and had failed to properly file the notice for such a change. We agree Higuera waived her right and, therefore, although we accept special action jurisdiction, we deny relief.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 Higuera was charged with theft, and arraigned on March 21. Her ease was assigned to the respondent on that date. On March 30, Higuera’s counsel filed a notice of change of judge…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ReidArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.