Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Little

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1941No. 15290PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Baker.

The principal question herein presented by this appeal from the order reversing the action of the full commission, and the single commissioner in awarding the claimant the sum of $500.00 for bodily disfigurement, is difficult of determination, the difficulty arising not so much in the application of the previous decisions of this Court, but by reason of the findings of fact by the Industrial' Commission, by which we are bound if there is any testimony from which a reasonable inference can be drawn to sustain its findings of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murdaugh v. Robert Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Manning v. Gossett MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Poole v. Saxon MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Burnette v. Startex MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Stone v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wallace v. Campbell Limestone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Bowen v. Chiquola Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Haynes v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  5. Shillinglaw v. Springs Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API