Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 22, 1994No. 5:93 CV 0680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, Sam B. Jones and Louann B. Jones, contend that the United States improperly assessed $100,000 of taxable income against them for the 1981 tax year. Plaintiffs seek a refund of federal income taxes, penalties, and interest claiming that they never received any portion of the $100,000 paid in consideration of a covenant not to compete. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a). The United States moves for summary judgment on all counts (Docket No. 23) and contends that there is no genuine issue of material fact that the $100,000 was taxable income to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Re/Max International v. Realty One, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API