Legal Opinion

Duckwall v. Kisner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1893No. 16,315PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney., J.

The appellee, Kisner,, sued to foreclose *100two mortgages executed by the appellants to secure notes executed by John Duckwall. The co-appellees of Kisner were made defendants to answer as to their interests.

The second answer of Lydia Duckwall was that she became the owner, by descent, of an interest in a body of land of which the tract mortgaged was a part; that she and the other tenants in common of said body of land, a brother and two sisters, made partition deeds; that the deed to that interest which should have been conveyed to her was made to and in the name of her husband, the said John…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Catherwood v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Maxon v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hirsch v. NortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Kelley v. FiskIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Clements v. DoakNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Guynn v. Wabash County Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Government Building & Loan Institution No. 2 v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pape v. PapeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API