Legal Opinion

Lerner v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 1986No. 85 Civ. 6091 (CHT)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

This is an interpleader action brought by the plaintiff, Micheline Lerner, in order to determine the rights of the various parties to ownership of a fund she has collected. The matter concerns conflicting claims of priority between the plaintiff and the defendants other than Alan Jay Lerner. Two of the defendants, Viking Penguin, Inc. (“Viking”) and the United States of America (“Government”), now move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, summary judgment is granted in favor of Viking and the Government.

BACKGROUND

In 1965, Micheline Lerner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. Pioneer American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. The United States of America, the Pecos County State BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Don King Productions, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Don King Productions, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Roberson v. RobersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. American Express Travel Related, Services Co. v. Kalish & Rice, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. United States v. VillongcoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API