United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
The issue here is whether, in a state proceeding under a general assignment for benefit of creditors, Section 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U. S. C. § 191, gives priority to a claim of the United States over a landlord’s lien and a municipal tax lien.
Mrs. Oeland Roman, the assignor, operated a restaurant in Danville, Virginia, on premises leased from respondent Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc. On June 19, 1941, she executed a general deed of assignment to a.trustee for the benefit of creditors, specifically conveying all personal property, fixtures and equipment used by her in the conduct of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- New York v. MacLaySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.