Legal Opinion

United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1945No. 65PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The issue here is whether, in a state proceeding under a general assignment for benefit of creditors, Section 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U. S. C. § 191, gives priority to a claim of the United States over a landlord’s lien and a municipal tax lien.

Mrs. Oeland Roman, the assignor, operated a restaurant in Danville, Virginia, on premises leased from respondent Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc. On June 19, 1941, she executed a general deed of assignment to a.trustee for the benefit of creditors, specifically conveying all personal property, fixtures and equipment used by her in the conduct of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. New York v. MacLaySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API