Legal Opinion

United States v. Villongco

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 13, 2017No. Criminal No. 2007-0009Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 07-9 (BAH) DAVID VILLONGCO, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is the government’s motion for reconsideration, Gov’t’s Mot. Reconsideration Mem. Opinion & Order Def.’s Mot. Quash Writ of Garnishment (“Gov’t’s Mot.”), ECF No. 57, of the decision granting the defendant’s motion to quash the government’s writ of garnishment as to certain retirement and brokerage accounts belonging to the defendant, see United States v. Villongco, Crim. Action…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API