Legal Opinion
Nashua Teachers Union v. Nashua School District
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 23, 1998No. 96-263PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
Defendant Russell Ober appeals an order of the Superior Court (Hampsey, J.) holding that compulsory agency fees imposed on non-union public employees pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement are lawful. We affirm.
The plaintiffs, Nashua Teachers Union (NTU) and Hudson Federation of Teachers (HFT), are the exclusive collective bargaining representatives for certain employees of the defendant Nashua and Hudson school districts. Defendant Russell Ober is an employee of the Hudson School District but is not a member of the HFT. Both plaintiffs negotiated collective bargaining agreements…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Smigel v. Southgate Community School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Town of North Kingstown v. North Kingstown Teachers Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wessel v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Doughty v. St EE's Ass'n of NHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Appeal of the StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Appeal of Police CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Dillman v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.