Legal Opinion
Dillman v. Town of Hooksett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 7, 2006No. 2005-564PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 34, the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Muirhead, J.) certified the following question for our consideration:
Whether, under New Hampshire law, including N.H. RSA 273-A, an individual public sector union member may be assigned his union’s right under N.H. RSA 542:8 to seek a vacation, confirmation, correction, or modification of an arbitration award entered in an arbitration conducted pursuant to a collective *345bargaining agreement between the member’s union and his employer.
We respond in the negative.
The district court’s order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Joseph Bryant, Sr. v. Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated Bell Atlantic Network Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Cleveland v. Porca Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Parvin Katir v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Soraghan v. Mt. Cranmore Ski Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Vonda A. Aloisi v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ruiz v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Gasparik v. FNMADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
- Appeal of New Hampshire Troopers Association & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
- Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024