Legal Opinion

Smilay v. Sage

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1943No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 42,251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Maurice D. Smilay, plaintiff, brought suit against the administrator of the estate of Robert E. Sage, deceased. In tbe declaration it is alleged that defendant’s decedent intentionally1 shot and wounded plaintiff with a loaded revolver. In his opening statement, counsel for plaintiff also claimed that decedent made an assault upon the plaintiff with a loaded revolver with the intention of shooting and wounding plaintiff and caused him large medical expenses, loss of earnings and much pain and suffering. At the trial plaintiff was asked by his counsel what happened at the time of the shooting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noonan v. VolekMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Justin v. KetchamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fojtik v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallery v. Van HoevenMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Russell v. OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API