Legal Opinion

Justin v. Ketcham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1941No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 41,403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. The facts are not in dispute. The collision occurred approximately 10 *594minutes after 12 o’clock noon. Plaintiff’s decedent, Jay Justin, died as the result 15 hours later. Defendant’s decedent, Cecil Beiersdorfer, was killed instantly by the collision. It is admitted that defendant’s decedent was guilty of negligence, that this was the proximate cause of the accident, and that plaintiff’s decedent was free from contributory negligence. The measure of damages, and the amount of damages, is not in dispute. Plaintiff, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lansing v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ford v. Maney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Olivier v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Booth v. FrankensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhitakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Fretz v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Meads v. DibbleeUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cash v. AddingtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smilay v. SageMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API