Legal Opinion

Mallery v. Van Hoeven

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket 78, Calendar 45,333PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Mary Culp, decedent, in 1942 deeded her home in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to her daughter Mabel, now Mabel Culp Mallery, the plaintiff .herein. Mrs. Culp reserved a life interest in the property. No monetary consideration was paid. Subsequently, on July 20, 1946, plaintiff reconveyed the property to her mother, the decedent, also without any monetary consideration. • On its face, the deed recites adequate consideration and was properly executed, filed, delivered and recorded. In a suit brought against the executor of decedent’s estate and Fred Kuiper, the main beneficiary under the last will of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kerns v. KernsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Paris v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Daugherty v. PoppenMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hope v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Straith v. StraithMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pressley v. Wayne County SheriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Petition of H. & H. Wheel Service, Inc. H. & H. Wheel Service, Inc. v. Paula Cornet, Adm'x of the Estate of Hector Cornet, Deceased Lena Loftus, Adm'x of the Estate of Thomas Loftus, Deceased and Anthony Klinicki. Paula Cornet, Adm'x of the Estate of Hector Cornet, Deceased v. H. & H. Wheel Service, Inc. Anthony Klinicki v. H. & H. Wheel Service, Inc. Lena Loftus, Adm'x of the Estate of Thomas Loftus, Deceased v. H. & H. Wheel Service, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Lewis v. PoelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. H. & H. Wheel Service, Inc. v. CornetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API