Legal Opinion

State v. MENDOZA-TAPIA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 2012No. 1 CA-CR 09-0809PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Noe Mendoza-Tapia appeals his convictions and sentences on one count each of kidnapping and theft by extortion, both class two felonies and dangerous offenses. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove the use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument in the theft by extortion, that the judge reversibly erred in refusing to order a retroactive competency hearing, and that the court miscalculated his presentence incarceration credit. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his convictions and sentences, but remand for recalculation of his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
  2. State of Arizona v. Amy Kay GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Alcott v. KillebrewCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. Capital One v. CastronovaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Citibank v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API