Viohl v. North Pacific Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Multnomah: Alfred E. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Henry Viohl against the North Pacific Lumber Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is a personal injury action. The plaintiff, while working for the defendant in its sawmill, was caught in a cogwheel gearing and injured. He brought this action to recover damages, alleging that defendant was negligent, among other things, in allowing the lower part of the cogwheels to be uncovered, and in ordering and directing him to work in close proximity thereto while they were in such condition, without cautioning or warning him of the danger. The defense is a denial of negligence, and a plea of assumption of risk and contributory negligence. On the trial the,plaintiff was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Ryerson v. Inhabitants of AbingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Dallemand v. SaalfeldtIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Greenleaf v. Dubuque & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mickel v. Haines Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Carroll v. Grande Ronde Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Hill v. SaugestedOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Filkins v. Portland Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Kopacin v. Crown-Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.