Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Grande Ronde Electric Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Union: Robert EakiN, Judge. Action by Eliza Carroll, as administratrix of the estate of Leonard Carroll, deceased, against the Grande Ronde Electric Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. I. Electricity being a peculiarly dangerous element, the law raises a presumption of negligence on the part of the person operating the wires conveying it, whenever they are down and injury results : Boydv. Portland Elec. Go., 40 Or. 126 (7 Am. Electl.

Read the full summary

From Union: Robert EakiN, Judge. Action by Eliza Carroll, as administratrix of the estate of Leonard Carroll, deceased, against the Grande Ronde Electric Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. I. Electricity being a peculiarly dangerous element, the law raises a presumption of negligence on the part of the person operating the wires conveying it, whenever they are down and injury results : Boydv. Portland Elec. Go., 40 Or. 126 (7 Am. Electl. Cas. 661, 57 L. R. A. 619,66 Pac. 576); Haynes v. Raleigh Gas Co.. 114 N. C. 203 (5 Am. Electl. Cas. 264, 26 L. R. A. 810, 41…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action by Eliza Carroll, as administratrix of the estate of her son Leonard Carroll; deceased, against the Grande Ronde Electric Co., a' private corporation, to recover damages resulting from his death, which is alleged to have been caused by its negligence in constructing lines of electric wires and in failing to repair such wires when broken. The answer denies the material averments of the complaint, and, for a further defense, alleges that Carroll’s death ensued from his own carelessness. The allegations of new matter in the answer were put in issue by the reply, and at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Johnston v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Boyd v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Massey v. SellerOregon Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bockman v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Mickel v. Haines Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API