Legal Opinion
Boyds Civic Ass'n v. Montgomery County Council
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 8, 1987No. 62, 100, September Term, 1986 (Two Cases)PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN H. SMITH, Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.
The Montgomery County zoning ordinance provides for what is called a Mineral Resource Recovery Zone. It is in the nature of a floating zone. A prerequisite to adoption of that zone for any specific area is that the master plan for the area must designate the land as suitable for such a zone. These two appeals involve an amendment to the Boyds Master Plan providing that certain land is suitable for such a zone.
In No. 62 we shall hold that property owners who contested the procedures leading to the designation of land adjacent to them on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Popham v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.