Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Iowa Central Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 7, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Gourt.— Hon. W. S. Witiieow, Judge. Action to recover damages caused by the killing of a mare running at large by a train on defendant’s railway. The opinion states the facts. There was a jury trial, and verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

i. Private cattle guards, I. Plaintiff owns a farm through which passes the line of defendant’s railway. . For many years a private crossing over the track, protected by wing fences and cattle guards, had been maintained by the defendant company for the benefit of plaintiff. Plaintiff’s mare in question passed over the cattle guard, and while upon the inclosed right- of way was struck by a passing train and killed. Under the pleadings and upon the trial the primary issue was as to the sufficiency of the cattle guard, and this issue was submitted to the jury under instructions which are not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smead v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bank of Monroe v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Judge v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KneadleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Timins v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harsch v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Pluym v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API