Legal Opinion

Smead v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Branch. (Pealei, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff in this case sued for the value of a colt killed by the defendant’s engine upon its right of way in April, 1882, at or near a place called Payne’s Cross ing, in the town of Batavia in Branch county. The action is based upon that part of How. Stat. § 3377, relating to cattle-guards, reading as follows : “ Every railroad company * * * shall erect and maintain fences on the sides of their respective roads of, the height and strength of a division fence required by law, with fences and cattle-guards at all 'highway and street crossings, sufficient to prevent cattle or other animals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Mitchell v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Ames v. SniderIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Joyce v. Maine InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  5. Veerhusen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jeter v. Schwind Quarry Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  2. Girard v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Johnson v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People ex rel. Esper v. Detroit & Saline Plank-Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API