Bank of Monroe v. Gifford
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Jasper District Court. — Hon. W. R. Lewis, Judge. Action upon á promissory note. There was a judgment upon a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The facts, so far as they are necessary to be stated for a proper understanding of the questions decided,' appear in the opinion. The case has twice heretofore been in this court. See 65 Iowa, 692; 72 Iowa, 750.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The questions arising in the case will be considered in the order of the argument, as far as practicable. The facts will be stated, as their consideration becomes necessary in the discussion of the questions determined.
The evidence shows that one R. C. Anderson was the cashier of plaintiff, and at the same time was the president and general manager of a corporation engaged in mining coal, called the “Anderson Bros. Mining & Railway Company.” He appropriated the funds of the bank to the use of the corporation, and, his improper practice in this regard being discovered, he was required to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Baldwin v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Port v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Gower v. HallowaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Higley & Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spaulding v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Cohen v. RossmooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- King Auto Service v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.