Hess v. Sturdavent
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Canadian County; R. B. Forrest, Judge. Action by W. A. Sturdavent against Carrie Hess. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This action was begun in the justice court of El Reno City township hy defendant in error against the plaintiff in error for work and labor done and material furnished by defendant in error to plaintiff in error. The parties will hereafter lie referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Judgment was rendered by default in the justice court, and plaintiff appealed the ease to the county court of Canadian county. There are no assignments ol’ error in the brief of plaintiff in error.
The case was tried to a jury, and the evidence was in con fli(;t as to whether or not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pilson v. Tip-Top Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Shuler Et Ux. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Anoatubby v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boorigie Bros. v. Quinn-Barry Tea & Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Byers v. BurtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923