Pilson v. Tip-Top Auto Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Hood Eiver: William L. Beadshaw, Judge. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Bamsey. Tbis is an action by E. H. Pilson against tbe Tip-Top Auto Company to recover judgment for injuries to an automobile caused by defendant’s alleged negligence as bailee. There was a judgment for plaintiff for $720.80, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
On or about the 1st day of October, 1911, the defendant was engaged in the business of storing and taking care of automobiles as a warehouseman for hire at Hood River, Oregon, and it carried on its business at two garages. One of them was situate at Columbia and Seventh Streets in the city of Hood River, and the other was located on the property of Charles P. McCan, about a mile southwest of said city. Both of these garages were owned and conducted by the defendant for hire.
On October 1, 1911, the plaintiff owned a Croxton-Keeton automobile. He was going east, and he made a contract with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Davis v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HiggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- McCurdy v. Wallblom Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Franklin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Irish & Swartz Stores v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.