Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Keystone Steel and Wire
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided May 12, 1995No. 93-1504PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Keystone’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (#68) and Motion for Summary Judgment (# 69). The Court has also raised a subject matter jurisdiction issue sua sponte. The Court ordered the parties to brief the issue of whether Title VII provides a cause of action for an employee who claims to have been the victim of sexual harassment by a supervisor or co-worker of the same gender. The Court’s request prompted Keystone’s Motion to Dismiss (#89), Charlie Cutting’s Motion to Dismiss Count III (#91), and Langley, Scoby, Jay, and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Johnson v. Hondo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas And Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 625, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,851 J. Doe and H. Doe, by Their Parents and Next Friends, David and Mary Doe v. City of Belleville, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Fredette v. BVP Management AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.